India’s Climate Laws and their Major Consequences Within the Realm of Realism

                                                              
                                                                   Author: Shreya Shaw 


Historically, since the beginning of the modern policy of 'Balance of Power' in International Relations, India and other countries yielded the idea of Non- aligned movement (NAM), which aims national interest, economic growth, sustainable development goals and mutual peaceful coexistence among countries with peace and harmony. In international affairs developing countries like India, which relies upon the ideologies of realism. And that emphasized upon national interest, national economic growth, foreign relations, trade and commerce through other countries. Nevertheless, it has omitted several substantial areas alike climate crisis and global environmental policies. 

 

After the 2015 Paris Agreement, most of the rich and developed countries from EU and the United States have emphasized  upon climate polices and tried to contrivance a few of them. Nonetheless, it has not reflected any positive impression so far. India where internal and external affairs and governmental policies primarily remains attentions upon nuclear weapons, disarmament policies, economic growth, development, employment, caste, religion and gender. However, measurable climate policies and environmental protection laws are insignificant. These remain wholly ignored because of the unawareness which carries major adverse penalties so far. 

 

Governmental policies in India The Ministry of Forest, Environment and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) issued the draft Environment Impact Assessment Notification (EIA) 2020 which swapped the existing EIA Notification 2006, under the environment (protection) Act, 1986. The deeds of EIA are possibly hurtful to the milieu. Nevertheless, in India, it hasn’t provided relevant details on Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, mitigation, adaptation possibilities, and it doesn’t cover climate-specific consequences. Additionally, in India where plainlands, grasslands, mangroves, deserts and rainforest areas are lengthily differentiated, and more than millions of people relay on natural resources. The Government of India (GOI) wholly fugitive from the attention of the environment and wildlife regulations. 

 

Since 2014, the GOI envisioned to the expanse of river, wildlife and environment but after the six years of the signs of progress are motionless. Subsequently, in 2019 the EIA draft notification derived which is an environmental threat in India. Especially, regions like Assam where many wildlife sanctuaries, national reserve forests are there. One of them is Dehing and Patkai which called the ‘Amazon of The East’, and it is the habitation for many ICUN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) rare species including flora and fauna.

 

The region Assam is an eco-sensitive and rich biodiversity area where the North- Easter Coal Field (NECF), a unit of Coal India Limited and Government of India approved coal mining projects which damage the biodiversity of the region. The regular excavation and manning projects can surge regular floods of this region. Nevertheless, the Government of India (GOI) has not stopped the coal mining and excavating developments yet. 

 

Another illegal mining ventures of the region Aravalli which breadths 700 km long mountain range which begins from India’s western state of Gujrat through Rajasthan and Haryana before terminating at Raisina hill, at the heart of national capital Delhi. The Aravalli hill is of the oldest mountain ranges in the world and full of mineral deposits, flora and fauna. Many water streams instigated from the hills of Aravalli. And which plays a shield against the Thar desert to defend parts of Rajasthan, Haryana and Delhi from dust, pollution, heat and sand storms. Additionally, the widespread and illicit deforestation, mining developments set effect on this region. Mining plans are violating the milieu and its wildlife sanctuary.  

 

India’s National Board for Wildlife (NBWL) puts a menace on the wildlife endangered areas. In India, the protected area (PA) network covers around 5.2 per cent of the country. Which concealments wildlife sanctuaries, national parks, conservation reserves, community reserves and marine protected areas. At the beginning of April, the National Board of Wildlife’s (NBWL) standing committee permitted 16 plans which will not assist in the environment. Similarly, these developments measured highways, transmission lines and railway lines through national parks, sanctuaries, and tiger stripes. Other actions involved some 3,00 acres of land in eco-sensitive expanses. Railway line through a tiger strip in Telangana, which requires almost 168 ha of forest land, and a diversion within Gangotri National Park, at the part of Uttarakhand. Besides a highway expansion through the Mollem Wildlife sanctuary in Goa. One object stands apparent that the National Board of Wildlife which is underneath the MoEFCC it has not protected the natural atmosphere and creatures of these areas instead of that they are terminating it solely. 

 

The Government of India’s Ministry of Forest, Environment and Climate Change missions habitually emphasized upon tourism, s
ubstructure, employment, development and financial advance. Still, it never stressed upon the environment, forest, and wildlife safety matters. Climate change is a civic problem. It has also described as a local, national and afterwards it’s a global problem. Hence, it has not easy to solve a global crisis. 

 

In International Relations, scholars like Morgenthau asserts about Balance of Power and national self-interest, which depends upon statecraft’s relative issues and gains. In realist’s world countries are not concerned about masses interest. They are not going to discuss it. However, global institutions and organizations (Greenpeace) those who are working for climate and environmental issues can lead a new movement towards violation of climate laws. Similarly, people should not ‘react’ upon climate change, but it is a time to ‘act’ to prevent the future climate distress.         

Author's Description

Shreya Shaw is a Post Graduate Student of Politics and International Studies Department at Pondicherry University, India. 

Post a Comment

0 Comments